Sometime between 1945 and 1953, the New York Times commissioned a survey, by their reporter
Harrison E. Salisbury, of the Jewish world-wide population, which was then published in their paper
________________in a box 2 columns wide by 8 inches long on page ________.
Reporting continent by continent, the total was 16 million.
The American Jewish Committee estimated the world Jewish population in 1949 as 11,303,350, and
as 16,643,120 in 1939. They also estimated 5,185,000 in the U.S. and Canada for 1949.
The Jewish Congregations figure of 5,000,000 is the 1948 estimate from the American Jewish Year
The Official Catholic Directory for 1950 reported 27,766,141 members in the Roman Catholic Church
in the United States.
White Guilt and the “Holocaust”
By: Ian P. McKinney
This month I am writing about the “Holocaust.” This term, unless referring to an ancient sacrificial
rite or the consumption of an object or place by fire, should always be put inside quotation marks.
Nobody denies that the conflict between the Jews and Germans was a central part of World War II.
Hundreds of thousands of Jews, many of them non-combatants, died in that conflict along with several
However, the “Holocaust” establishment has fashioned the “Holocaust” into a powerful
psychological weapon with which to bludgeon White Americans (Americans!). They imply that in some
sense we are responsible for the supposed deaths of “six million Jews” and that we must now pay
penance, not only to the Jews, but to non-Whites everywhere for the “sins” of our race. This libel must
not remain unchallenged “Holocaust” propaganda is one of the legs upon which stands the edifice of
“White guilt.” But it is a very shaky leg indeed, and we do ourselves no credit if we can’t take the trouble
to kick it out.
“Holocaust” promoters justify their activities, in part, by bemoaning the activities of the Revisionist
historians who question the standard version of World War II. This justification seems a bit lame when
you consider that for well over fifty years American has been inundated by literally thousands of books,
magazines, newspapers, movies, and alleged “documentaries” about the “Holocaust,” while up until
the last few years “Holocaust” Revisionism was, as far as the general public was concerned, almost
Until quite recently most Americans and Europeans just accepted the Jewish version of World War
II history as fact. For example, we all heard the story that the Germans produced soap which was
supposedly extracted from the fat taken from the bodies of murdered Jews. Well, this ridiculous
nonsense has been debunked so thoroughly now that it has been quietly dropped by the “Holocaust”
establishment, although one stills sees it pop up from time to time in the popular media.
Another fraudulent story that circulated in the early days of “Holocaust” promotion was that Jews,
instead of being gassed, were “steamed” to death. Then there was yet another fabricated story in which
the Germans used electricity to kill Jews using large “electrocution” chambers. Another story was that
the Germans killed Jews by driving over them with “heavy motor lorries.”(Big trucks). It didn’t matter that
there was absolutely no proof to substantiate these wild claims.
The public would believe almost anything they were told. The Germans had to be evil since we had just
sacrificed so many of our boys to destroy them. Our cause just had to be noble, and no dissenting voice
was heard. (Of course this was long before the World Wide Web provided a forum for dissenting views.
No wonder Jewish groups are now so frantic to establish some control over the Web.) It didn’t matter
that no one could produce even one bar of soap that was actually made from human fat. It didn’t matter
that nothing resembling a steam or electrocution chamber could be located anywhere in Europe. It didn’
t matter that so many of these colorful “eyewitness” accounts turned out to be absurd and impossible
lies. Each of these stories was believed by millions of naïve people, and each was shamelessly
promoted for decades.
So now we’re left with one last fantastic “Holocaust” story: the alleged killing of six million Jews
using execution gas chambers. But unlike fifty years ago, we now have a number of courageous
Revisionists asking questions that are apparently very embarrassing to the “Holocaust” establishment.
First, they are asking just how did the establishment arrive at the magic figure of “six million” on the
first place? Just what real proof do they have? And has there ever been any physical evidence to prove
that Adolf Hitler ever ordered the guessing of even one Jew, let alone the alleged “six million”? Well, the
proof has never been provided.
A few years ago the new government in Poland abandoned some of the claims made by the former
Communist regime and quietly revised the figures for deaths at the Auschwitz work camp downward by
2.5 million. This reduction was reported in the New York Times and by the major wire services, though
the implications for the sacred “six million” figure were not mentioned.
How many times since then have you heard the old “six million” figure thrown about in the media
with absolutely no mention of the admitted correction of the wartime atrocity propaganda by 2.5 million
The exposure of many of the more outlandish “Holocaust” whoppers and the significant reduction in
the numbers claimed to have died in German concentration camps have not stopped the figure of “six
million” from taking on an almost religious significance. It has become so ingrained in the public’s
psyche that any effort to bring reality into the situation, it is apparently feared, might start the public
thinking forbidden thoughts.
Even more significant are the records captured from the camps in eastern Europe by the
advancing Communist armies which were recently made available from the KGB archives. If accepted,
these records show that heaths in the camps were far, far less than that now admitted for Auschwitz
alone—on the order of hundreds of thousands, not millions. And certainly only a fraction of these
persons were deliberately killed. If these figures were widely publicized the public might start to view all
the “Holocaust” hysteria as “much ado about nothing. “They might start to see liars for what they are.
Probably most people really would not care whether the Jewish establishment wants to claim six
million, 3.5 million, or 150,000, and certainly if we were talking about anything except the “Holocaust” it
would be thought to be very good news indeed to discover that millions of persons, who were
previously thought to have died, had actually survived. However we war not talking about any other
historical event. The real reason for the fanatical adherence to the “six million” figure has much more to
do with politics, power, and money than with history.
Ideally, historical inquiry is an objective endeavor where evidence is weighed and an honest effort is
made to determine what actually happened. However, the atmosphere surrounding the “Holocaust” is
anything but objective. Things have gone so far that countries like Canada, Germany, and France have
actually prosecuted individuals just for questioning the conventional version of the “holocaust.”
Even here in America, where it is not yet illegal to publicly ask the wrong question, any public figure
that does so is subjected to smears, intimidation, and the attempted destruction of his career and
reputation by organized Jewry and the very cooperative media whores.
The publicity obtained by Jewish groups when that hunt down some 80-year-old concentration
camp guard and try him as a “war criminal” in a kangaroo court is of highly questionable value even
from the Jewish point of view. Yet they pursue such individuals with avid intensity. Why are they so
single-minded, so fanatical, when most other ethnic groups are able to put aside the memories of the
atrocities committed against them. Part of the answer lies in the unique Jewish mentality of “never
forgive, never forget.” The main reason, however, is the power that the “holocaust” bestows upon them,
a kind of hypnotic power over us.
So let’s take a look at the psychological, political, and economic power of the “Holocaust” story.
The story holds that Adolf Hitler was the most evil man to ever live because he executed “six million”
innocent Jewish civilians, mainly by poison gas. If anyone expresses a viewpoint that can be interpreted
as favorable to the survival of the White race, even if he never mentions World War II or Germany or
Hitler, it won’t be very long before organized Jewish groups or their liberal allies will pipe up and say,
“That’s racist; that’s what Hitler believed; that idea leads straight to the gas chambers of Auschwitz; you’
re a nazi; we must oppose all ideas that Hitler espoused, especially the idea of a White nation.”
Exposure of some of the lies told by Jewish groups about the “Holocaust” will diminish this
bludgeon used on White people’ heads and may remove some of the chains from the minds of so
Here is one example. Nearly everyone has heard the story of the Jewish girl Anne Frank. According
to her best-selling book she was hidden in an attic by a Dutch family until the later years of the World
Was II. Then she was interned at various camps in Eastern Europe and Germany. One thing is clear:
Anne Frank was not gassed. She died of typhus while at the Bergan-Belsen camp just before the end of
the war. The obvious question is: Why would the Germans waste valuable resource and time to
transport a sickly 14-year-old Jewish girl all over Europe if their intention was simply to gas her? With
transport and fuel in extremely short supply, especially near the chaotic end of the war, it just doesn’t
make sense. It should also be noticed that Anne Frank’s father, also a concentration camp internee,
was found at the end of the war recovering from an illness in a German hospital. It should seem
ridiculous to anyone that the Germans would be attempting to restore Mr. Frank’s health just so they
could then put him into a gas chamber, especially when medical facilities were desperately needed for
the care of wounded German soldiers.
What do you think would happen if the true figures for Jewish losses became generally known? All
of a sudden, “the most evil man in history” becomes a mere piker when compared to the likes of
Joseph Stalin and Mao Tse Tung, who undoubtedly murdered many dozens of millions under regimes
that lasted for decades. And what happened when it is discovered that Hitler never gave any orders for
Jews or anyone else to be gassed, but had only planned a relocation, interrupted and complicated by
the war, of Jews to the east, after unsuccessful negotiations – including negotiations with Zionist Jews
– to find a home for them in the Middle East or Madagascar?
The “Holocaust” Story is also a prop for the idea that the Jews are eternally persecuted – but totally
innocent – people who have never harmed anyone else or engaged in any kind of persecution
This idea is shown to be nonsense by a reading of the Jew’s own history as recorded by them in
their Torah. There we have numerous cases of the Hews invading, enslaving, or exterminating other
tribes, including the women and children, whose only crime was to be in possession of things that the
Jews wanted. There are instances in which their God admonished and even punished them for not
doing a thorough enough job of exterminating their victims. The Jews’ early history is in fact chock full of
theft, enslavement, murder, mayhem, and extermination visited upon other peoples.
What is even more hypocritical is that the Jews celebrate their acts of genocide. An example of this
is their Purim holiday during which they celebrate their murder of 70,000 Persian men, women, and
For nearly fifty years the governments of the West, with few exceptions, have consistently looked the
other way with regard to Zionist terrorism against the British, the Palestinian, and American population
One of the earliest of these outrages was the bombing of the King David Hotel by the Stern Gang –
led by future Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin – which killed over a hundred British women and
children. That was only the beginning.
In 1967 Israel treacherously attacked the USS Liberty, a lightly armed US intelligence ship, killing 34
Americans and wounding scores of the others. There can now be no disputing that Israel knew its
identity, and that the ship was in international waters and clearly marked as a US Naval vessel. The
only thing that prevented all on board from perishing, and the attack being blamed on the Arabs, was
that the ship did not sink. Even this was in doubt for some time, which prompted the captain to order
that the wounded men be put into life rafts in preparation for abandoning ship. Even with the ship
ablaze from Israeli napalm and rocket attacks, listing heavily, and taking on water, Israeli gunboats saw
fit to continue the attack by machine-gunning the life rafts. At some point the Israelis realized that the
ship had managed to transmit a distress signal and alerted the area command as to who was carrying
out the assault, which finally caused Israel to order its planes and gunboats to leave.
The greatest outrage that day was not the perfidy of Israel, however, but the treasonous compliance
of the politicians in Washington, who refused to take any action against Israel and hushed-up the whole
affair. See Assault on the Liberty by deck officer James Ennes jr., do a search on the web.
Another example of Israel’s callous disregard for its supposed “ally” America was the bombing of
the U.S. Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983, which killed over 200 US servicemen. According to former
Israeli Mossad agent, Victor Ostrovsky, Israeli intelligence knew of the plan by Arab terrorists to bomb
the building in plenty of time to warn the innocent men, but cynically refused to say anything. (See By
Way Of Deception by Victor Ostrovsky, do a search on the web.)
Interspersed with these, the Israelis have committed a multitude of murders and tortures against
mostly unarmed Palestinians, and even recently launched an attack on a United Nations refugee camp
in Lebanon. Ari Shavit an Israeli reporter straight out of the trenches, filed the following, translated from
Hebrew in Liberation of May 21, 1996, and titled “Cana: 102 Faceless Dead”.
Ari Shavit Israeli reporter: “We killed 170 people in Lebanon, most of whom were refugees, during
the month of April 1996. Many of them were women, old people, and children. We killed 9 civilians, one
a 2-year-old girl and one a centenarian, in Sahmour, on April 11th. We killed 11 civilians, including 7
children, in Nabatyeh, on April 18th. In the UN Camp in Cana, we killed 102 people.”
Given this history it becomes even more astounding that we hand over at least three billion dollars
in direct cash aid, and untold amounts of military technology and intelligence to Israel annually in
addition to the periodic loan guarantees that run into the billions. And all this is on top of the billions that
Germany has been giving them for the past fifty years.
And what do Israel’s benefactors receive in return for this largess and invaluable grants of
technology? For the Germans, an unceasing stream of hate propaganda designed at the very least to
demonize by association millions of Germans who were not even born until after World War II. In the
case of America, it comes in the form of blackmailing and bribing our politicians into unquestioning
support for any bill or appropriation benefiting Israel. We are also “paid back” by the theft of whatever
classified information we don’t already give them, as in the Jonathan Pollard case. In addition, our
constant involvement in tumultuous Middle Eastern political affairs on the side of Israel gains us the
hatred of millions of outraged Arabs, as manifested by the recent World Trade Center bombing and
other acts of terror.
Lastly, we have the ludicrous “Holocaust”-derived proposition that since Hitler identified the Jews
as foreigners, different form the Germans, we must not make any distinctions today on the basis of
race. According to the “Holocaust” hucksters any linkage of nationhood and race is evil, and therefore
all immigration policies based on ethnicity or race are likewise evil. In essence this “holocaust”
indoctrination has, to a large degree, resulted in psychological paralysis rendering us unable to control
This paralysis is probably the most pernicious idea presently connected with the “Holocaust,” and
is exemplified in a twenty-page pamphlet, entitled Holocaust Revisionism, recently produced by the
“Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute” (whatever that is) For distribution within the U.S.
military, ostensibly to counter the ever increasing doubts concerning the “Holocaust” raised by
The Pamphlet was largely written by a Captain Carlos Huerta, an orthodox Jewish chaplain, lately
associated with a university in Israel.
It states on part: “A successful fighting force is a cohesive one, one where all members have
respect for each other’s diversity and dignity. Holocaust revisionism has the potential to destroy that
So according to the good rabbi our view of the “Holocaust” is directly linked to our toleration for
“diversity.” Perhaps he is right on that score! However, we haven’t seen much support for “diversity” in
Israel! The undeniable fact is that Israel is a quintessential racial state in which the preservation and
elevation of the Jewish people is codified into law.
Listen to the following statement that appeared in Canada’s Maclean’s magazine for June 10, 1996:
“We don’t believe in multinational states,’ said Israeli Labor Health Minister, Ephraim Sneh. “It didn’t
work in Yugoslavia, and history is full of horrifying examples of what happens in multinational states.
Separation is the only way to build a reasonable co-existence here.’
So while Jews in America work feverishly to promote “diversity” and “tolerance,” their fellow Jews in
Israel want nothing to do with it.
My purpose is not to promote racial diversity either in Israel anywhere else, but mainly to point out
the sticking double standard of the Jewish establishment. In fact, nearly every idea connected with the
“Holocaust” reeks with such hypocrisy.
The “Holocaust” is really about breaking down the racial and cultural barriers of others, while
serving as a rallying cry for Jewish nationalism and cohesiveness. We might do well to remember that
ethnic groups that suppress their survival instinct are displaced by those that heed it, and the Jews
have been refining theirs for 3,000 years.